<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Buzz &#187; gpu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-buzz.info/category/gpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-buzz.info</link>
	<description>What&#039;s the Buzz right now?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA&#8217;s 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/06/nvidias-2012-kepler-lineup-revealed-possibly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/06/nvidias-2012-kepler-lineup-revealed-possibly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/06/nvidias-2012-kepler-lineup-revealed-possibly/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/9-21-10-gputech11004.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/9-21-10-gputech11004.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> As usual, it seems like whenever a big chip company wants to keep those key details under wraps, someone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/04/leaked-amd-roadmap-reveals-next-gen-fusion-tablet-chips/">leaves</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/">spreadsheet</a> lying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/">in a bar</a>. Of course, the following information could be the product of a vengeful former employee mashing at a keyboard, so let's agree that these are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/RumorMill/">rumored</a> details until further notice. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nvidia/">NVIDIA's</a> whole range of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/06/nvidias-kepler-gpu-still-kinda-sorta-on-scheduled-for-2011-d/">Kepler-powered</a> graphics cards will be PCI-E 3.0 compliant, with the GTX690 topping the group at $999 when it arrives in Q3 of this year, while the modestly-priced GTX640 will retail for $139 when it arrives in May. If you'd like to drill down into the specifics of all eight cards purportedly on offer for 2012, we've got all the details in a handy chart nestled just after the interval.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/">NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:26:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.itproportal.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-lineup-revealed/">ITProPortal</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://lenzfire.com/2012/02/entire-nvidia-kepler-series-specifications-price-release-date-43823/">Lenzfire</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20165246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/9-21-10-gputech11004.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> As usual, it seems like whenever a big chip company wants to keep those key details under wraps, someone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/04/leaked-amd-roadmap-reveals-next-gen-fusion-tablet-chips/">leaves</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/">spreadsheet</a> lying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/">in a bar</a>. Of course, the following information could be the product of a vengeful former employee mashing at a keyboard, so let's agree that these are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/RumorMill/">rumored</a> details until further notice. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nvidia/">NVIDIA's</a> whole range of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/06/nvidias-kepler-gpu-still-kinda-sorta-on-scheduled-for-2011-d/">Kepler-powered</a> graphics cards will be PCI-E 3.0 compliant, with the GTX690 topping the group at $999 when it arrives in Q3 of this year, while the modestly-priced GTX640 will retail for $139 when it arrives in May. If you'd like to drill down into the specifics of all eight cards purportedly on offer for 2012, we've got all the details in a handy chart nestled just after the interval.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/">NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:26:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.itproportal.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-lineup-revealed/">ITProPortal</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://lenzfire.com/2012/02/entire-nvidia-kepler-series-specifications-price-release-date-43823/">Lenzfire</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20165246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/06/nvidias-2012-kepler-lineup-revealed-possibly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking next-gen augmented reality for an ARM-powered walk around the block</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/03/taking-next-gen-augmented-reality-for-an-arm-powered-walk-around-the-block/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/03/taking-next-gen-augmented-reality-for-an-arm-powered-walk-around-the-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/03/taking-next-gen-augmented-reality-for-an-arm-powered-walk-around-the-block/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/metaio-outdoors-600px.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/metaio-outdoors-600px.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>We know what you're thinking, because we initially thought it too, but this isn't your average AR. With the help of chip designer <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ARM">ARM</a>, a number of developers are building a new type of augmented reality that is altogether more powerful than the usual <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/augmented-reality-thundercats/">sprite-on-a-surface</a> routine. Instead of requiring well-lit, artificial and often indoor surfaces and markers, this new technology sucks every ounce of juice from a smartphone's processor in order to recognize, track and augment real-world 3D objects like people and buildings. It's still at an early stage and far from being practical, but the exclusive videos after the break ought to prove that this approach has potential. In fact, it's probably what augmented reality ought to have been in the first place. Read on for more.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Taking next-gen augmented reality for an ARM-powered walk around the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/">Taking next-gen augmented reality for an ARM-powered walk around the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20160322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/metaio-outdoors-600px.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>We know what you're thinking, because we initially thought it too, but this isn't your average AR. With the help of chip designer <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ARM">ARM</a>, a number of developers are building a new type of augmented reality that is altogether more powerful than the usual <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/augmented-reality-thundercats/">sprite-on-a-surface</a> routine. Instead of requiring well-lit, artificial and often indoor surfaces and markers, this new technology sucks every ounce of juice from a smartphone's processor in order to recognize, track and augment real-world 3D objects like people and buildings. It's still at an early stage and far from being practical, but the exclusive videos after the break ought to prove that this approach has potential. In fact, it's probably what augmented reality ought to have been in the first place. Read on for more.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Taking next-gen augmented reality for an ARM-powered walk around the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/">Taking next-gen augmented reality for an ARM-powered walk around the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20160322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/next-gen-augmented-reality-from-arm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/03/taking-next-gen-augmented-reality-for-an-arm-powered-walk-around-the-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Radeon HD 7970 now shipping: $550 and up for unlimited* frames-per-second</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-now-shipping-550-and-up-for-unlimited-frames-per-second/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-now-shipping-550-and-up-for-unlimited-frames-per-second/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NowShipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[now shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-now-shipping-550-and-up-for-unlimited-frames-per-second/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/7970-radeon-hd-on-sale.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/7970-radeon-hd-on-sale.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It's the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">Radeon HD 7970</a>. It's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">wildly fast</a>. It's quite possibly the exact device needed to serve up your latest Steam purchases in pure 1080p glory. And it's on sale now from none other than NewEgg, as linked in the source below.<br />
<br />
*<em>Unlimited may or may not actually refer to unlimited, but as the carriers have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/sprint-to-nix-unlimited-from-mobile-broadband-and-hotspot-plan/">taught</a> us, we don't truly have to be accurate here. </em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/">AMD Radeon HD 7970 now shipping: $550 and up for unlimited* frames-per-second</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:36:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&#38;N=100007709%20600286767&#38;IsNodeId=1&#38;name=Radeon%20HD%207000%20series">NewEgg</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20143367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/7970-radeon-hd-on-sale.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It's the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">Radeon HD 7970</a>. It's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">wildly fast</a>. It's quite possibly the exact device needed to serve up your latest Steam purchases in pure 1080p glory. And it's on sale now from none other than NewEgg, as linked in the source below.<br />
<br />
*<em>Unlimited may or may not actually refer to unlimited, but as the carriers have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/sprint-to-nix-unlimited-from-mobile-broadband-and-hotspot-plan/">taught</a> us, we don't truly have to be accurate here. </em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/">AMD Radeon HD 7970 now shipping: $550 and up for unlimited* frames-per-second</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:36:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;N=100007709%20600286767&amp;IsNodeId=1&amp;name=Radeon%20HD%207000%20series">NewEgg</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20143367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-on-sale-shipping-now-newegg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/09/amd-radeon-hd-7970-now-shipping-550-and-up-for-unlimited-frames-per-second/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world&#8217;s 96th most powerful supercomputer</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-supercomputer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-supercomputer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-supercomputer/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/wu-feng-1222.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/wu-feng-1222.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If basking in the presence of a powerful supercomputer is on your list of "must-haves" when selecting a proper university, then you may wish to fire off an admissions application to the Hokies at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/virginia+tech">Virginia Tech</a>. The school's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/07/virginia-techs-hokiespeed-supercomputer-to-rely-on-cpu-and-gpu/">HokieSpeed</a> system is now in its final stages of testing, which combines 209 separate computers, each powered by dual six-core Xeon E5645 CPUs and two NVIDIA M2050 / C2050 448-core GPUs, with a single-precision peak processing capability of 455 teraflops. To put things in perspective, HokieSpeed is now the 96th most powerful computer in the world, and yet it was built for <em>merely</em> $1.4 million in loose change -- the majority of which came from a National Science Foundation grant. As a further claim to fame, HokieSpeed is the 11th most energy-efficient supercomputer in the world. Coming soon, the system will drive a 14-foot wide by four-foot tall visualization wall, which is to consist of eight 46-inch Samsung 3D televisions humming in unison. After all, with virtually limitless potential, these scientists will need a fitting backdrop for all those Skyrim sessions. The full PR follows the break, complete with commentary from the system's mastermind, Professor Wu Feng.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/">VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:43:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20134125/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/wu-feng-1222.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If basking in the presence of a powerful supercomputer is on your list of "must-haves" when selecting a proper university, then you may wish to fire off an admissions application to the Hokies at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/virginia+tech">Virginia Tech</a>. The school's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/07/virginia-techs-hokiespeed-supercomputer-to-rely-on-cpu-and-gpu/">HokieSpeed</a> system is now in its final stages of testing, which combines 209 separate computers, each powered by dual six-core Xeon E5645 CPUs and two NVIDIA M2050 / C2050 448-core GPUs, with a single-precision peak processing capability of 455 teraflops. To put things in perspective, HokieSpeed is now the 96th most powerful computer in the world, and yet it was built for <em>merely</em> $1.4 million in loose change -- the majority of which came from a National Science Foundation grant. As a further claim to fame, HokieSpeed is the 11th most energy-efficient supercomputer in the world. Coming soon, the system will drive a 14-foot wide by four-foot tall visualization wall, which is to consist of eight 46-inch Samsung 3D televisions humming in unison. After all, with virtually limitless potential, these scientists will need a fitting backdrop for all those Skyrim sessions. The full PR follows the break, complete with commentary from the system's mastermind, Professor Wu Feng.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/">VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:43:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20134125/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-supercomputer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Radeon HD 7970 review roundup: supremely fast, relatively efficient</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-efficient/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-efficient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-efficient/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/radeon-logo2.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/radeon-logo2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
AMD's next flagship graphics card was only announced a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/">few hours ago</a>, and it won't arrive on the gaming public's plate until January, but already the tech punditry has tasted it, tested it and spat out a soggy little piece of paper that reads: "the fastest single-GPU card in the world." What we're really looking for, though, is the type of performance that beats older rivals like NVIDIA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/09/nvidia-geforce-gtx-580-reviewed-what-the-gtx-480-should-have-b/">GeForce GTX 580</a> without blowing the house up like a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/08/amd-launches-radeon-hd-6990-powerhouse-for-699-maintains-worl/">dual-GPU product</a>. As it turns out, most reviewers agree that is exactly what this new $549 Radeon delivers, albeit with the few caveats summarized after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD Radeon HD 7970 review roundup: supremely fast, relatively efficient</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">AMD Radeon HD 7970 review roundup: supremely fast, relatively efficient</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:13:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20133598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/radeon-logo2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
AMD's next flagship graphics card was only announced a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/">few hours ago</a>, and it won't arrive on the gaming public's plate until January, but already the tech punditry has tasted it, tested it and spat out a soggy little piece of paper that reads: "the fastest single-GPU card in the world." What we're really looking for, though, is the type of performance that beats older rivals like NVIDIA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/09/nvidia-geforce-gtx-580-reviewed-what-the-gtx-480-should-have-b/">GeForce GTX 580</a> without blowing the house up like a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/08/amd-launches-radeon-hd-6990-powerhouse-for-699-maintains-worl/">dual-GPU product</a>. As it turns out, most reviewers agree that is exactly what this new $549 Radeon delivers, albeit with the few caveats summarized after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD Radeon HD 7970 review roundup: supremely fast, relatively efficient</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">AMD Radeon HD 7970 review roundup: supremely fast, relatively efficient</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:13:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20133598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-efficient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD announces next-gen Radeon HD 7970 for $549, says it &#8217;soundly beats&#8217; rivals</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/21/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly-beats-rivals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/21/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly-beats-rivals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/21/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly-beats-rivals/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/radeon2.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/radeon2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
A fresh contender for your blow-out 2012 Olympic gaming rig: AMD's first 28nm GPU, the Radeon HD 7970. It's scheduled to arrive on January 9th, priced at $549 -- nearly $200 more than its direct ancestor, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/15/amd-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950-launch-assault-on-enthusiast-gami/">6970</a>. Then again, this newcomer packs some supremely athletic specs, including a 925MHz engine clock that can be readily OC'd to 1.1GHz, 2,048 stream processors and an uncommonly muscular 384-bit memory bus serving 3GB of GDDR5. At the same time, AMD hopes to make the card more practical than the dual-processor <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/08/amd-launches-radeon-hd-6990-powerhouse-for-699-maintains-worl/">6990</a> by bringing the card's power consumption down to less than 300W under load and a mere 3W in 'long idle' mode, and promising quieter cooling thanks to improved airflow and a bigger fan. We'll have to wait for benchmarks in January before we hand out any medals, but in the meantime NVIDIA's forthcoming 28nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/06/nvidias-kepler-gpu-still-kinda-sorta-on-scheduled-for-2011-d/">Kepler GPU</a> might want to step up its training schedule.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Pre-release reviews are out already and our round-up will follow imminently. <p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD announces next-gen Radeon HD 7970 for $549, says it 'soundly beats' rivals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/">AMD announces next-gen Radeon HD 7970 for $549, says it 'soundly beats' rivals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:01:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/7000/7970/Pages/radeon-7970.aspx">AMD</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20132987/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/radeon2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
A fresh contender for your blow-out 2012 Olympic gaming rig: AMD's first 28nm GPU, the Radeon HD 7970. It's scheduled to arrive on January 9th, priced at $549 -- nearly $200 more than its direct ancestor, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/15/amd-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950-launch-assault-on-enthusiast-gami/">6970</a>. Then again, this newcomer packs some supremely athletic specs, including a 925MHz engine clock that can be readily OC'd to 1.1GHz, 2,048 stream processors and an uncommonly muscular 384-bit memory bus serving 3GB of GDDR5. At the same time, AMD hopes to make the card more practical than the dual-processor <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/08/amd-launches-radeon-hd-6990-powerhouse-for-699-maintains-worl/">6990</a> by bringing the card's power consumption down to less than 300W under load and a mere 3W in 'long idle' mode, and promising quieter cooling thanks to improved airflow and a bigger fan. We'll have to wait for benchmarks in January before we hand out any medals, but in the meantime NVIDIA's forthcoming 28nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/06/nvidias-kepler-gpu-still-kinda-sorta-on-scheduled-for-2011-d/">Kepler GPU</a> might want to step up its training schedule.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Pre-release reviews are out already and our round-up will follow imminently. <p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD announces next-gen Radeon HD 7970 for $549, says it 'soundly beats' rivals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/">AMD announces next-gen Radeon HD 7970 for $549, says it 'soundly beats' rivals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:01:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/7000/7970/Pages/radeon-7970.aspx">AMD</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20132987/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/21/amd-announces-next-gen-radeon-hd-7970-for-549-says-it-soundly-beats-rivals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zalman reportedly entering the graphics card market, merging GPUs with cooling solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/10/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpus-with-cooling-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/10/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpus-with-cooling-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/10/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpus-with-cooling-solutions/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/zalman-1323448978.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/zalman-1323448978.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 521px; width: 465px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Recently leaked slides suggest Korean computer outfit Zalman will soon jump into the ever-expanding graphics card market, initially partnering with AMD on its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/radeon/">Radeon series</a>. Known best for its quiet computing technologies, the company's move to infuse GPUs with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/07/zalman-techs-zm-nc1000-laptop-cooler-not-as-noisy-as-you-think/">cooling solutions</a> could enhance the performance of the cards, making overclocking a lesson in simplicity. The slides only show the AMD 6870, 6850, and 6770, but it's feasible more models will appear when official news is released. Given AMD's many board partners, differentiation is important to remain competitive and on their payroll -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/ask-engadget-best-sub-400-desktop-graphics-card-on-the-market/">graphics cards</a> and their overheating habits is Zalman's cup of tea. Hopefully this brings more innovative products in the coming future (heck, we've already got <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/03/bigfoot-networks-reveal-gpu-nic-combo-card-talk-up-motherboar/">GPU / NIC hybrids</a>), perhaps as early as CES. Check past the break to view the specifications breakdown for the aforementioned cards.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Zalman reportedly entering the graphics card market, merging GPUs with cooling solutions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/">Zalman reportedly entering the graphics card market, merging GPUs with cooling solutions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:15:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5210/zalman-to-enter-graphics-card-market-with-amd-gpus">AnandTech</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.overclockers.ua/news/hardware/2011-12-08/108489/">Overclockers.ua</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20124626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/zalman-1323448978.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 521px; width: 465px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Recently leaked slides suggest Korean computer outfit Zalman will soon jump into the ever-expanding graphics card market, initially partnering with AMD on its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/radeon/">Radeon series</a>. Known best for its quiet computing technologies, the company's move to infuse GPUs with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/07/zalman-techs-zm-nc1000-laptop-cooler-not-as-noisy-as-you-think/">cooling solutions</a> could enhance the performance of the cards, making overclocking a lesson in simplicity. The slides only show the AMD 6870, 6850, and 6770, but it's feasible more models will appear when official news is released. Given AMD's many board partners, differentiation is important to remain competitive and on their payroll -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/ask-engadget-best-sub-400-desktop-graphics-card-on-the-market/">graphics cards</a> and their overheating habits is Zalman's cup of tea. Hopefully this brings more innovative products in the coming future (heck, we've already got <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/03/bigfoot-networks-reveal-gpu-nic-combo-card-talk-up-motherboar/">GPU / NIC hybrids</a>), perhaps as early as CES. Check past the break to view the specifications breakdown for the aforementioned cards.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Zalman reportedly entering the graphics card market, merging GPUs with cooling solutions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/">Zalman reportedly entering the graphics card market, merging GPUs with cooling solutions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:15:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5210/zalman-to-enter-graphics-card-market-with-amd-gpus">AnandTech</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.overclockers.ua/news/hardware/2011-12-08/108489/">Overclockers.ua</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20124626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/10/zalman-reportedly-entering-the-graphics-card-market-merging-gpus-with-cooling-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Samsung chip has two of everything: two cores, 2GHz, 2560 x 1600 graphics</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x-1600-graphics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x-1600-graphics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x-1600-graphics/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/exynos-5250.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/exynos-5250.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></div>
Sammy's current Cortex A9-based chips are hardly slackers -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> already proved that to any lingering doubters. Nevertheless, the next-gen Exynos 5250 SoC promises to double that sort of performance, by harnessing two <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/arm-predicts-dual-core-cortex-a15-devices-in-late-2012-quad-cor/">Cortex-A15 chips</a> clocked at 2GHz each, along with a GPU that can output resolutions of up to 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA). It's like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/arm-unveils-cortex-a7-processor-big-little-computing/">big.LITTLE </a>computing, except without the LITTLE. Samsung reckons it'll start mass producing the 5250 for use in high-end tablets by the second quarter of next year, which should be just in time to stop <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra3">NVIDIA</a> from getting too cocky.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/">New Samsung chip has two of everything: two cores, 2GHz, 2560 x 1600 graphics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:02:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://sammyhub.com/2011/11/30/samsung-unveils-cortex-a15-2ghz-exynos-5250-soc/">SammyHub</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20117339/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/exynos-5250.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></div>
Sammy's current Cortex A9-based chips are hardly slackers -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> already proved that to any lingering doubters. Nevertheless, the next-gen Exynos 5250 SoC promises to double that sort of performance, by harnessing two <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/arm-predicts-dual-core-cortex-a15-devices-in-late-2012-quad-cor/">Cortex-A15 chips</a> clocked at 2GHz each, along with a GPU that can output resolutions of up to 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA). It's like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/arm-unveils-cortex-a7-processor-big-little-computing/">big.LITTLE </a>computing, except without the LITTLE. Samsung reckons it'll start mass producing the 5250 for use in high-end tablets by the second quarter of next year, which should be just in time to stop <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra3">NVIDIA</a> from getting too cocky.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/">New Samsung chip has two of everything: two cores, 2GHz, 2560 x 1600 graphics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:02:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://sammyhub.com/2011/11/30/samsung-unveils-cortex-a15-2ghz-exynos-5250-soc/">SammyHub</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20117339/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x-1600-graphics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA announces special edition GTX 560 Ti with 448 CUDA cores, available now for $289</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores-available-now-for-289/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores-available-now-for-289/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores-available-now-for-289/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/633882nvlogo3ddarktype-copy.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/633882nvlogo3ddarktype-copy.jpg" style="width: 240px; height: 187px; float: left; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 16px 4px;" /></a>Now that we're officially in the throes of holiday shopping season, NVIDIA's rolling out a promotion of its own, though sadly it doesn't involve any steep discounts. The outfit just announced a special edition GPU: the GTX 560 Ti with 448 CUDA cores, running at 1.46GHz, a 732MHz graphics clock and 1.25GB of GDDR5 memory charging ahead at an effective rate of 3.8GHz. Other features include support for three-way SLI, DisplayPort, HDMI and DVI. Those specs place it snugly between the current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/25/nvidia-geforce-gtx-560-ti-second-generation-fermi-for-the-250/">GTX 560 Ti</a> with 384 CUDA cores, and the higher-end <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/07/nvidia-geforce-gtx-570-debuts-the-580-goes-on-a-power-diet-to-f/">GTX 570</a>, which packs 480. If this seems like a puzzling move, it is indeed the first time NVIDIA's bothered with a limited holiday edition card, though in conversations with reporters the company made it clear its new hardware is meant to dovetail with the arrival of games like <em>The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim</em>, <em>Battlefield 3</em> and <em>Batman: Arkham City</em>. If you're shopping for a gamer (or, you know, yourself), it's available now for $289 in the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Russia and Nordic countries through companies like ASUS, MSI and Gigabyte, among others.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Looks like the reviews are rolling in! We've linked a handful of 'em below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/">NVIDIA announces special edition GTX 560 Ti with 448 CUDA cores, available now for $289</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20106259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/633882nvlogo3ddarktype-copy.jpg" style="width: 240px; height: 187px; float: left; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 16px 4px;" /></a>Now that we're officially in the throes of holiday shopping season, NVIDIA's rolling out a promotion of its own, though sadly it doesn't involve any steep discounts. The outfit just announced a special edition GPU: the GTX 560 Ti with 448 CUDA cores, running at 1.46GHz, a 732MHz graphics clock and 1.25GB of GDDR5 memory charging ahead at an effective rate of 3.8GHz. Other features include support for three-way SLI, DisplayPort, HDMI and DVI. Those specs place it snugly between the current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/25/nvidia-geforce-gtx-560-ti-second-generation-fermi-for-the-250/">GTX 560 Ti</a> with 384 CUDA cores, and the higher-end <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/07/nvidia-geforce-gtx-570-debuts-the-580-goes-on-a-power-diet-to-f/">GTX 570</a>, which packs 480. If this seems like a puzzling move, it is indeed the first time NVIDIA's bothered with a limited holiday edition card, though in conversations with reporters the company made it clear its new hardware is meant to dovetail with the arrival of games like <em>The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim</em>, <em>Battlefield 3</em> and <em>Batman: Arkham City</em>. If you're shopping for a gamer (or, you know, yourself), it's available now for $289 in the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Russia and Nordic countries through companies like ASUS, MSI and Gigabyte, among others.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Looks like the reviews are rolling in! We've linked a handful of 'em below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/">NVIDIA announces special edition GTX 560 Ti with 448 CUDA cores, available now for $289</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20106259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/29/nvidia-announces-special-edition-gtx-560-ti-with-448-cuda-cores-available-now-for-289/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell posts inaccurate graphics card comparison, promptly removes it and apologizes</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes-it-and-apologizes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes-it-and-apologizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes-it-and-apologizes/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/dell-graphics-card.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/dell-graphics-card.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Dell/">Dell</a>'s latest attempt to promote its high-end GPUs has fallen flat among online consumers, all because of a rather misleading comparison. The snafu stems from the above image, originally posted on the company's "Help me choose" feature -- an online assistant designed to help users customize their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/optiplex">Optiplex</a> desktops. At left is a desktop with a normal graphics card, juxtaposed with an identical machine packing Dell's "high-end" GPU. Both are displaying a Windows desktop at the same resolution, but the render on the left looks noticeably blurry. As many <em>Reddit</em> users soon pointed out, even the most prosaic of graphics cards would be able to transmit a blur-free Windows desktop, implying that the PC manufacturer may have taken some unfounded liberties with its imagery. <em>PC Pro</em> notified Dell of the discrepancy, and the graphic has since been removed. The company also issued the following apology, claiming that it had no intention of bending the truth:</div>
<blockquote>
	<div style="text-align: left; ">
		Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Dell endeavours to help customers to make the best decisions regarding their purchases. It was never our intention to mislead customers, and we apologise for any confusion caused. We have now removed the image from our Global sites. Dell remains committed to delivering the best possible experience to all our customers.</div>
</blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/">Dell posts inaccurate graphics card comparison, promptly removes it and apologizes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:30:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/25/2585746/dell-misleading-graphics-card-buying-advice">The Verge</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/11/23/dells-unhelpful-graphics-card-buying-advice/">PC Pro</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/mle4f/is_this_image_on_the_dell_website_complete_bcks/">Reddit</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20114421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/dell-graphics-card.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Dell/" style="text-align: -webkit-auto; ">Dell</a>'s latest attempt to promote its high-end GPUs has fallen flat among online consumers, all because of a rather misleading comparison. The snafu stems from the above image, originally posted on the company's "Help me choose" feature -- an online assistant designed to help users customize their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/optiplex">Optiplex</a> desktops. At left is a desktop with a normal graphics card, juxtaposed with an identical machine packing Dell's "high-end" GPU. Both are displaying a Windows desktop at the same resolution, but the render on the left looks noticeably blurry. As many <em>Reddit</em> users soon pointed out, even the most prosaic of graphics cards would be able to transmit a blur-free Windows desktop, implying that the PC manufacturer may have taken some unfounded liberties with its imagery. <em>PC Pro</em> notified Dell of the discrepancy, and the graphic has since been removed. The company also issued the following apology, claiming that it had no intention of bending the truth:</div>
<blockquote>
	<div style="text-align: left; ">
		Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Dell endeavours to help customers to make the best decisions regarding their purchases. It was never our intention to mislead customers, and we apologise for any confusion caused. We have now removed the image from our Global sites. Dell remains committed to delivering the best possible experience to all our customers.</div>
</blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/">Dell posts inaccurate graphics card comparison, promptly removes it and apologizes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:30:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/25/2585746/dell-misleading-graphics-card-buying-advice">The Verge</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/11/23/dells-unhelpful-graphics-card-buying-advice/">PC Pro</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/mle4f/is_this_image_on_the_dell_website_complete_bcks/">Reddit</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20114421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/dell-posts-inaccurate-graphics-card-comparison-promptly-removes-it-and-apologizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

