<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Buzz &#187; benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-buzz.info/category/benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-buzz.info</link>
	<description>What&#039;s the Buzz right now?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm&#8217;s MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/"><img alt="Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> We put <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-msm8960-development-tablet-hands-on-vide/">Qualcomm's S4 development platform</a> through its paces (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/live-from-the-engadget-ces-stage-an-interview-with-qualcomm/">twice</a>, no less) at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/ces/">CES</a>, but shorn of the glitz of Las Vegas, does it have the oomph to wow us? Someone at the company <em>loosed </em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Nenamark 2</a> on the slate, producing a score of 54.90. Given the fact that its producing graphics for a 1024 x 600 screen, we're excited to see it comfortably edge the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-review/">Galaxy S II Skyrocket </a>(54.1) and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> (32.8) -- with our mouths watering at the thought of what this 28nm CPU can do in a smartphone. We've included the benchmark in full after the break, if you're ready for such exciting revelations.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/First-Qualcomm-MSM8960-Snapdragon-S4-graphical-benchmark-score-appears_id26387?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+phonearena%2FySoL+%28Phone+Arena+-+Latest+News%29">Phonearena</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://score.nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2&#38;device_id=1369">Nena</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20159568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/"><img alt="Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> We put <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-msm8960-development-tablet-hands-on-vide/">Qualcomm's S4 development platform</a> through its paces (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/live-from-the-engadget-ces-stage-an-interview-with-qualcomm/">twice</a>, no less) at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/ces/">CES</a>, but shorn of the glitz of Las Vegas, does it have the oomph to wow us? Someone at the company <em>loosed </em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Nenamark 2</a> on the slate, producing a score of 54.90. Given the fact that its producing graphics for a 1024 x 600 screen, we're excited to see it comfortably edge the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-review/">Galaxy S II Skyrocket </a>(54.1) and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> (32.8) -- with our mouths watering at the thought of what this 28nm CPU can do in a smartphone. We've included the benchmark in full after the break, if you're ready for such exciting revelations.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/First-Qualcomm-MSM8960-Snapdragon-S4-graphical-benchmark-score-appears_id26387?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+phonearena%2FySoL+%28Phone+Arena+-+Latest+News%29">Phonearena</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://score.nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2&amp;device_id=1369">Nena</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20159568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> may still be a ways from breaking into the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">smartphone</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">tablet</a> market, but we're finally starting to get some concrete details on its specs and capabilities. <em>VR-Zone</em> got the nitty gritty on Chipzilla's first <em>true</em> SoC and it looks almost ready to run with the big dogs. A reference tablet, running at 1.6GHz with 1GB of RAM (which also packs Bluetooth, WiFi and FM radio) was put through some Android benchmarks and held it's own against a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/snapdragon">Snapdragon</a> MSM8260 -- which pulled a 7,500 and 8,000 in Caffeinemark 3, respectively. The admittedly higher clocked Atom scored an impressive 10,500, though power consumption on the pre-production chips was a bit higher than anticipated. At idle, the fledgling Medfield was sucking down 2.6W and spiking to 3.6W under load. Ultimately Intel hopes to cut those numbers to 2W at idle and 2.6W while pushing out HD video -- not far off from current-gen ARM SoC. Lets not forget though, benchmarks only tell part of the story -- we'll be waiting to see working hardware before declaring a victor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/41967/intel-medfield-cpu-performance-power-consumption-leaked-looks-good/">Netbook News</a></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/intel-s-32nm-medfield-mobile-chip-surprising-performance-power-consumption-leaked/14355.html#ixzz1hhjsk1c4">VR-Zone</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> may still be a ways from breaking into the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">smartphone</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">tablet</a> market, but we're finally starting to get some concrete details on its specs and capabilities. <em>VR-Zone</em> got the nitty gritty on Chipzilla's first <em>true</em> SoC and it looks almost ready to run with the big dogs. A reference tablet, running at 1.6GHz with 1GB of RAM (which also packs Bluetooth, WiFi and FM radio) was put through some Android benchmarks and held it's own against a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/snapdragon">Snapdragon</a> MSM8260 -- which pulled a 7,500 and 8,000 in Caffeinemark 3, respectively. The admittedly higher clocked Atom scored an impressive 10,500, though power consumption on the pre-production chips was a bit higher than anticipated. At idle, the fledgling Medfield was sucking down 2.6W and spiking to 3.6W under load. Ultimately Intel hopes to cut those numbers to 2W at idle and 2.6W while pushing out HD video -- not far off from current-gen ARM SoC. Lets not forget though, benchmarks only tell part of the story -- we'll be waiting to see working hardware before declaring a victor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/41967/intel-medfield-cpu-performance-power-consumption-leaked-looks-good/">Netbook News</a></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/intel-s-32nm-medfield-mobile-chip-surprising-performance-power-consumption-leaked/14355.html#ixzz1hhjsk1c4">VR-Zone</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><p style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p>
<p>
	LG and Prada may have already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/lg-prada-officially-renew-phone-partnership-confirm-v3-0-for-e/">renewed</a> their wedding vows, but it's been pretty quiet on the designer phone front. However, a stream of benchmark results have surfaced over at <em>Antutu</em>, revealing an LG phone with a 1GHz CPU running Android Gingerbread -- version 2.3.7 to be precise. The handset is labelled up as the P940, suggesting that this could well be the fruits of labor from the fashion-phonemaker collaboration -- aka the Prada K2. A device with the same codename has already paid a visit to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/fcc-fridays-november-4-2011/">FCC</a>, although it kept quiet on the hardware specifics, not revealing much more than a clutch of GPRS and HSPA radios. Rumors suggest the hardware will all be contained in an appropriately stylish 9mm frame, but we'll just have to wait and see. It may be just a sliver of a smartphone, but we hope LG <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/more-optimus-handsets-will-receive-ice-cream-sandwich-upgrade-l/">considers</a> feeding it some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-review/">Ice Cream Sandwich</a> before it makes its debut. Not too much though, it still needs to fit into that Prada outfit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/">LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:54:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://pocketnow.com/android/lg-p940-aka-prada-k2-shows-up-in-antutu-benchmark">PocketNow</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.antutu.net/">Antutu</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p>
<p>
	LG and Prada may have already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/lg-prada-officially-renew-phone-partnership-confirm-v3-0-for-e/">renewed</a> their wedding vows, but it's been pretty quiet on the designer phone front. However, a stream of benchmark results have surfaced over at <em>Antutu</em>, revealing an LG phone with a 1GHz CPU running Android Gingerbread -- version 2.3.7 to be precise. The handset is labelled up as the P940, suggesting that this could well be the fruits of labor from the fashion-phonemaker collaboration -- aka the Prada K2. A device with the same codename has already paid a visit to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/fcc-fridays-november-4-2011/">FCC</a>, although it kept quiet on the hardware specifics, not revealing much more than a clutch of GPRS and HSPA radios. Rumors suggest the hardware will all be contained in an appropriately stylish 9mm frame, but we'll just have to wait and see. It may be just a sliver of a smartphone, but we hope LG <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/more-optimus-handsets-will-receive-ice-cream-sandwich-upgrade-l/">considers</a> feeding it some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-review/">Ice Cream Sandwich</a> before it makes its debut. Not too much though, it still needs to fit into that Prada outfit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/">LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:54:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://pocketnow.com/android/lg-p940-aka-prada-k2-shows-up-in-antutu-benchmark">PocketNow</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.antutu.net/">Antutu</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indilinx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OczTechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolidStateDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Maybe it's just interference from our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/holidaygiftguide2011/">seasonal goggles</a>, but isn't there something quite cheery about SSD reviews? In the case of OCZ's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/ocz-pushes-access-time-boundaries-with-octane-and-octane-s2-ssds/">Octane</a> drive, our good spirits derive from the sturdy performance of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/14/ocz-buys-indilinx-probably-has-designs-on-building-its-own-ssd/">freshly-conceived</a> Indilinx Everest controller, which ought to keep big players like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandforce">SandForce</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung+ssd/">Samsung</a> on their toes. <em>HotHardware</em> just reviewed the <strike>$369</strike> $879 512GB variant and found that it delivered fast boot-up times, strong read speeds and writes that were just shy of enthusiast-class drives. Follow the source link for the full and possibly festive benchmarks.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Sorry about the optimistic price error. Guess we got carried away with all the holiday discounts. As many of y'all spotted, it's the 256GB version that goes for $369.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> We just added links to reviews from <em>AnandTech</em> and <em>Storage Review</em>, which both arrived at similarly positive conclusions. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/">OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:40:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/OCZ-Octane-Series-SATA-III-Solid-State-Drive-Review/?page=1">HotHardware</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_octane_ssd_review">Storage Review</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5147/the-ocz-octane-review-512gb/1">AnandTech</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Maybe it's just interference from our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/holidaygiftguide2011/">seasonal goggles</a>, but isn't there something quite cheery about SSD reviews? In the case of OCZ's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/ocz-pushes-access-time-boundaries-with-octane-and-octane-s2-ssds/">Octane</a> drive, our good spirits derive from the sturdy performance of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/14/ocz-buys-indilinx-probably-has-designs-on-building-its-own-ssd/">freshly-conceived</a> Indilinx Everest controller, which ought to keep big players like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandforce">SandForce</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung+ssd/">Samsung</a> on their toes. <em>HotHardware</em> just reviewed the <strike>$369</strike> $879 512GB variant and found that it delivered fast boot-up times, strong read speeds and writes that were just shy of enthusiast-class drives. Follow the source link for the full and possibly festive benchmarks.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Sorry about the optimistic price error. Guess we got carried away with all the holiday discounts. As many of y'all spotted, it's the 256GB version that goes for $369.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> We just added links to reviews from <em>AnandTech</em> and <em>Storage Review</em>, which both arrived at similarly positive conclusions. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/">OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:40:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/OCZ-Octane-Series-SATA-III-Solid-State-Drive-Review/?page=1">HotHardware</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_octane_ssd_review">Storage Review</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5147/the-ocz-octane-review-512gb/1">AnandTech</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Jetstream review</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
When HTC entered the tablet game, it did so in reverse course. Where other manufacturers were jostling for elbow room in a 10-inch form factored world, the company opted for smaller, more familiar battleground, eschewing the rough-hewn <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb/">Honeycomb OS</a> for a Gingerbread-baked Sense overlay on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/16/htc-flyer-review/">the Flyer</a>. Naturally, the time for that mini-slate to shine has come and gone. In its stead, we're treated to a flagship of sorts -- HTC's first 10-incher and AT&#38;T's inaugural <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/atandt-commits-to-lte-advanced-deployment-in-2013-hesse-and-mead/">4G LTE</a> slate. Android 3.1 makes an appearance here, as does Sense 1.1 for tablets, but is the skinned experience really any different from the custom UX we've all come to love or hate on phones? Can the added <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/htc+scribe/">Scribe pen</a> functionality, repurposed here from its 7-inch brother, transform the Jetstream from third pillar offering to an always-on, on-the-go assistant? And will those newly hatched 700MHz speeds convince you to cough up for that weighty $700 price tag? Follow along past the break to see how it fared.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568083"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv53dsc00552_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568081"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv51dsc00546_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568082"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv52dsc00550_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568084"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv54dsc00553_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568085"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv55dsc00556_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream review</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20094212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
When HTC entered the tablet game, it did so in reverse course. Where other manufacturers were jostling for elbow room in a 10-inch form factored world, the company opted for smaller, more familiar battleground, eschewing the rough-hewn <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb/">Honeycomb OS</a> for a Gingerbread-baked Sense overlay on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/16/htc-flyer-review/">the Flyer</a>. Naturally, the time for that mini-slate to shine has come and gone. In its stead, we're treated to a flagship of sorts -- HTC's first 10-incher and AT&amp;T's inaugural <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/atandt-commits-to-lte-advanced-deployment-in-2013-hesse-and-mead/">4G LTE</a> slate. Android 3.1 makes an appearance here, as does Sense 1.1 for tablets, but is the skinned experience really any different from the custom UX we've all come to love or hate on phones? Can the added <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/htc+scribe/">Scribe pen</a> functionality, repurposed here from its 7-inch brother, transform the Jetstream from third pillar offering to an always-on, on-the-go assistant? And will those newly hatched 700MHz speeds convince you to cough up for that weighty $700 price tag? Follow along past the break to see how it fared.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568083"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv53dsc00552_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568081"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv51dsc00546_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568082"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv52dsc00550_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568084"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv54dsc00553_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568085"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv55dsc00556_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream review</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20094212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA says Tegra 3 is a &#8216;PC-class CPU,&#8217; has screenshots to prove it</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/08/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prove-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/08/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prove-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tegra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/08/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prove-it/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/bladeslingernov2011.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/bladeslingernov2011.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Asus can't be absorbing all those limelight photons today. Not when its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/transformer-prime-detailed-10-inch-super-ips-display-12-hour/">freshly detailed </a>Transformer Prime depends so heavily on NVIDIA's special sauce. Admittedly, we already know a lot about Tegra 3 from its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/kal-el/">Kal-El</a> days, but we haven't seen much in the way of real-world performance claims. Until now, that is. Below you'll see newly released screenshots of Android games that have been souped-up to capitalize on the imminent Asus Eee Pad as well as other Tegra 3-powered devices -- including smartphones -- that are expected early next year. NVIDIA has also put out slides containing in-house benchmarks and head-to-head comparisons with the Tegra 2, which you'll find right after the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/">Tegra 3 game screenshots</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592920"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592909"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592913"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592906"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592907"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA says Tegra 3 is a 'PC-class CPU,' has screenshots to prove it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/">NVIDIA says Tegra 3 is a 'PC-class CPU,' has screenshots to prove it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:32:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20101258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/bladeslingernov2011.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Asus can't be absorbing all those limelight photons today. Not when its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/transformer-prime-detailed-10-inch-super-ips-display-12-hour/">freshly detailed </a>Transformer Prime depends so heavily on NVIDIA's special sauce. Admittedly, we already know a lot about Tegra 3 from its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/kal-el/">Kal-El</a> days, but we haven't seen much in the way of real-world performance claims. Until now, that is. Below you'll see newly released screenshots of Android games that have been souped-up to capitalize on the imminent Asus Eee Pad as well as other Tegra 3-powered devices -- including smartphones -- that are expected early next year. NVIDIA has also put out slides containing in-house benchmarks and head-to-head comparisons with the Tegra 2, which you'll find right after the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/">Tegra 3 game screenshots</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592920"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592909"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592913"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592906"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/tegra-3-game-screenshots/#4592907"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/tegra2011-11-08800px-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA says Tegra 3 is a 'PC-class CPU,' has screenshots to prove it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/">NVIDIA says Tegra 3 is a 'PC-class CPU,' has screenshots to prove it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:32:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20101258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/08/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prove-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angelbird&#8217;s Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolidStateDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Storage enthusiasts (yeah, there <i>is</i> such a thing -- what of it?) would probably tell you that PCIe-based SSDs are a dime a dozen these days. But in all seriousness, the prices we're seeing are proof that a few more competitors wouldn't hurt. A few weeks back, Austria's own Angelbird <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/angelbirds-pcie-based-ssd-its-real-its-shipping-its-800mb/">started to ship</a> a solution that we first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/angelbirds-pcie-ssd-solution-brings-breakneck-speeds-achievabl/">heard about</a> during 2010, and we were fortunate enough to pop a Wings PCIe SSD RAID card into our Mac Pro for testing. For years, we've been booting this up and running every single application off of its stock HDD -- a 640GB Hitachi HDE721064SLA360 (7200RPM) -- as we surmise many of you desktop owners might be. Anxious to see if these are the Wings your existing tower needs to soar? Head on past the break for our impressions. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/">Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471496"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0203_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471495"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0204_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471494"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0205_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471493"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0206_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471491"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0207_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/">Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.angelbird.com/store/featured-products/wings-pcie.html">Angelbird</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20048940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Storage enthusiasts (yeah, there <i>is</i> such a thing -- what of it?) would probably tell you that PCIe-based SSDs are a dime a dozen these days. But in all seriousness, the prices we're seeing are proof that a few more competitors wouldn't hurt. A few weeks back, Austria's own Angelbird <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/angelbirds-pcie-based-ssd-its-real-its-shipping-its-800mb/">started to ship</a> a solution that we first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/angelbirds-pcie-ssd-solution-brings-breakneck-speeds-achievabl/">heard about</a> during 2010, and we were fortunate enough to pop a Wings PCIe SSD RAID card into our Mac Pro for testing. For years, we've been booting this up and running every single application off of its stock HDD -- a 640GB Hitachi HDE721064SLA360 (7200RPM) -- as we surmise many of you desktop owners might be. Anxious to see if these are the Wings your existing tower needs to soar? Head on past the break for our impressions. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/">Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471496"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0203_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471495"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0204_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471494"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0205_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471493"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0206_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471491"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0207_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/">Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.angelbird.com/store/featured-products/wings-pcie.html">Angelbird</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20048940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Jetstream hits AT&amp;T store, gets benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-att-store-gets-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-att-store-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BreakingNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-att-store-gets-benchmarked/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/htc-jeatstream83283947328493.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/htc-jeatstream83283947328493.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Thinking about picking up an (inconceivably <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/31/htcs-10-inch-puccini-tablet-gets-official-as-jetstream-brings/">expensive</a>) HTC Jetstream? After all, it just slipped into AT&#38;T's online store this weekend. We'll just leave this link to <em>HotHardware</em> in the source below, in case you want to check out some comparative benchmarks before trading $700 for a two-year contract. Not that it performed poorly mind you, it raced neck-and-neck with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/04/lenovo-ideapad-k1-review/">Lenovo's IdeaPad K1</a> -- we just like think charts and tables are cool. Videos too -- hit the break to see the folks at <em>HotHardware</em> give the 10-inch slate a quick hands-on.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream hits AT&#38;T store, gets benchmarked</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/">HTC Jetstream hits AT&#38;T store, gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:44:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/News/HTC-Jetstream-ATT-4G-LTE-Tablet-HandsOn-Sneak-Peek/">HotHardware</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=HTC+Jetstream+%28TM%29+-+Shimmering+Silver&#38;q_sku=sku5330326#fbid=jW5cRkGfEEi?tabModule">AT&#38;T</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20034706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/htc-jeatstream83283947328493.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Thinking about picking up an (inconceivably <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/31/htcs-10-inch-puccini-tablet-gets-official-as-jetstream-brings/">expensive</a>) HTC Jetstream? After all, it just slipped into AT&amp;T's online store this weekend. We'll just leave this link to <em>HotHardware</em> in the source below, in case you want to check out some comparative benchmarks before trading $700 for a two-year contract. Not that it performed poorly mind you, it raced neck-and-neck with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/04/lenovo-ideapad-k1-review/">Lenovo's IdeaPad K1</a> -- we just like think charts and tables are cool. Videos too -- hit the break to see the folks at <em>HotHardware</em> give the 10-inch slate a quick hands-on.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream hits AT&amp;T store, gets benchmarked</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/">HTC Jetstream hits AT&amp;T store, gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:44:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/News/HTC-Jetstream-ATT-4G-LTE-Tablet-HandsOn-Sneak-Peek/">HotHardware</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=HTC+Jetstream+%28TM%29+-+Shimmering+Silver&amp;q_sku=sku5330326#fbid=jW5cRkGfEEi?tabModule">AT&amp;T</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20034706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-att-store-gets-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WD&#8217;s 9.5mm Scorpio Blue 1TB laptop hard drive gets benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NowShipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[now shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviewed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/wd-1tb-laptop-hard-drive.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/wd-1tb-laptop-hard-drive.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 12px; float: left;" /></a>These days, it's hard to shake the urge to pop a solid state drive into your next laptop, but even if you're down with dropping the requisite coin, the restrictive capacity choices may make it darn near impossible for pack rats to bite. For those fitting squarely into <i>that</i> category, there's Western Digital's newest laptop drive: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/20/western-digital-now-shipping-2-5-inch-1tb-scorpio-blue-hdd-in-st/">9.5mm 1TB Scorpio Blue</a>. It's one of the first in this form factor (read: the one that slips into most everything smaller than a Clevo) to hit the 1TB milestone, and at just $99, it's a veritable bargain. The benchmarking gurus over at <i>Hot Hardware</i> threw it through the usual gauntlet of tests, pitting it against a 500GB Scorpio Black and a 640GB Seagate Momentus. As you'd likely expect, the 1TB spinner bested the competition in SiSoftware, ATTO and CrystalDiskMark tests, though not by a tremendous margin. Still, taking performance up a notch while also boasting a full terabyte of space makes it somewhat of a no-brainer for capacity freaks, and you can hit the source for a barrage of charts proving as much.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/">WD's 9.5mm Scorpio Blue 1TB laptop hard drive gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:07:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/1TB-WD-Scorpio-Blue-25-HD-QuickTake/">Hot Hardware</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20005325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/wd-1tb-laptop-hard-drive.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 12px; float: left;" /></a>These days, it's hard to shake the urge to pop a solid state drive into your next laptop, but even if you're down with dropping the requisite coin, the restrictive capacity choices may make it darn near impossible for pack rats to bite. For those fitting squarely into <i>that</i> category, there's Western Digital's newest laptop drive: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/20/western-digital-now-shipping-2-5-inch-1tb-scorpio-blue-hdd-in-st/">9.5mm 1TB Scorpio Blue</a>. It's one of the first in this form factor (read: the one that slips into most everything smaller than a Clevo) to hit the 1TB milestone, and at just $99, it's a veritable bargain. The benchmarking gurus over at <i>Hot Hardware</i> threw it through the usual gauntlet of tests, pitting it against a 500GB Scorpio Black and a 640GB Seagate Momentus. As you'd likely expect, the 1TB spinner bested the competition in SiSoftware, ATTO and CrystalDiskMark tests, though not by a tremendous margin. Still, taking performance up a notch while also boasting a full terabyte of space makes it somewhat of a no-brainer for capacity freaks, and you can hit the source for a barrage of charts proving as much.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/">WD's 9.5mm Scorpio Blue 1TB laptop hard drive gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:07:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/1TB-WD-Scorpio-Blue-25-HD-QuickTake/">Hot Hardware</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20005325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/engadgetprimedlogo-20110624.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><em><strong>Primed </strong>goes in-depth on the technobabble you hear on Engadget every day -- we dig deep into each topic's history and how it benefits our lives. Looking to suggest a piece of technology for us to break down? Drop us a line at <strong>primed *at* engadget *dawt* com</strong>.</em><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<br />
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/engadgetprimedlogo-20110624.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a><br />
	<div style="background-color: transparent; margin-top: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-right: 0px; ">
	</div>
</div>
Staring at your smartphone, you realize that there's something missing. It does everything you want it to -- very well, we might add -- but what hole is left to fill? We'll help you out with this one: you want bragging rights. There <em>has</em> to be a way to face your friends with confidence, right? All you need is a little nudge in the right direction, and in this edition of Engadget Primed, we'll give you that much-needed shove by explaining benchmarks.<br />
<br />
Perhaps you've seen us talk about benchmarks in our product reviews. We'll typically use them to gauge the relative performance of various devices, but discussing a Linpack score doesn't mean much without going deeper into what it actually means. What aspects of performance do these benchmarks measure, and what techniques do they use? How much can we rely on them when making purchasing decisions? Read on after the break for the full scoop.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19983830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em><strong>Primed </strong>goes in-depth on the technobabble you hear on Engadget every day -- we dig deep into each topic's history and how it benefits our lives. Looking to suggest a piece of technology for us to break down? Drop us a line at <strong>primed *at* engadget *dawt* com</strong>.</em><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<br />
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/engadgetprimedlogo-20110624.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a><br />
	<div style="background-color: transparent; margin-top: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-right: 0px; ">
	</div>
</div>
Staring at your smartphone, you realize that there's something missing. It does everything you want it to -- very well, we might add -- but what hole is left to fill? We'll help you out with this one: you want bragging rights. There <em>has</em> to be a way to face your friends with confidence, right? All you need is a little nudge in the right direction, and in this edition of Engadget Primed, we'll give you that much-needed shove by explaining benchmarks.<br />
<br />
Perhaps you've seen us talk about benchmarks in our product reviews. We'll typically use them to gauge the relative performance of various devices, but discussing a Linpack score doesn't mean much without going deeper into what it actually means. What aspects of performance do these benchmarks measure, and what techniques do they use? How much can we rely on them when making purchasing decisions? Read on after the break for the full scoop.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19983830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

