<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Buzz &#187; benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-buzz.info/category/benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-buzz.info</link>
	<description>What&#039;s the Buzz right now?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest-new-1-5ghz-dual-core-exynos-processor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest-new-1-5ghz-dual-core-exynos-processor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest-new-1-5ghz-dual-core-exynos-processor/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/bench.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/dnp-is-this-the-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmark-tests-suggest/"><img alt="Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/bench.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Pinch of salt time. As mobile manufacturers polish up those final test models ready for us to pore over in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MWC+2012/">just a few weeks</a>, someone's possibly jumped the gun. What you're looking at here are apparently benchmarks from the Galaxy S II Plus -- yep, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/samsung-galaxy-s-advance-smartphone-announced/">another</a> incremental step-up for an existing Samsung device. According to the results, the phone will carry the same resolution screen of the original (800 x 480), but will purportedly be the first device to carry a dual-core 1.5GHz Exynos processor -- placing it just ahead of even the Galaxy Note. Unfortunately, the benchmark read-out also lists Android 2.3.4 for the phone -- a little old (and unlikely) when we're seeing version 2.3.7 if not a leap to Ice Cream Sandwich. Benchmark results featuring a Galaxy Nexus with a 2GHz processor (possibly overclocked) has also got us all kinds of suspicious. We'll be keeping our eyes on this one.<br /> <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/">Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:27:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-Plus-might-be-on-the-way-with-beefier-1.5GHz-silicon_id26500">PhoneArena</a></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.jpct.de/an3dbenchxl/details.php?code=NDcxNjAx118578">An3DBenchXL</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20162605/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/dnp-is-this-the-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmark-tests-suggest/"><img alt="Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/bench.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Pinch of salt time. As mobile manufacturers polish up those final test models ready for us to pore over in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MWC+2012/">just a few weeks</a>, someone's possibly jumped the gun. What you're looking at here are apparently benchmarks from the Galaxy S II Plus -- yep, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/samsung-galaxy-s-advance-smartphone-announced/">another</a> incremental step-up for an existing Samsung device. According to the results, the phone will carry the same resolution screen of the original (800 x 480), but will purportedly be the first device to carry a dual-core 1.5GHz Exynos processor -- placing it just ahead of even the Galaxy Note. Unfortunately, the benchmark read-out also lists Android 2.3.4 for the phone -- a little old (and unlikely) when we're seeing version 2.3.7 if not a leap to Ice Cream Sandwich. Benchmark results featuring a Galaxy Nexus with a 2GHz processor (possibly overclocked) has also got us all kinds of suspicious. We'll be keeping our eyes on this one.<br /> <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/">Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:27:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-Plus-might-be-on-the-way-with-beefier-1.5GHz-silicon_id26500">PhoneArena</a></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.jpct.de/an3dbenchxl/details.php?code=NDcxNjAx118578">An3DBenchXL</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20162605/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest-new-1-5ghz-dual-core-exynos-processor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm&#8217;s MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/"><img alt="Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> We put <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-msm8960-development-tablet-hands-on-vide/">Qualcomm's S4 development platform</a> through its paces (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/live-from-the-engadget-ces-stage-an-interview-with-qualcomm/">twice</a>, no less) at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/ces/">CES</a>, but shorn of the glitz of Las Vegas, does it have the oomph to wow us? Someone at the company <em>loosed </em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Nenamark 2</a> on the slate, producing a score of 54.90. Given the fact that its producing graphics for a 1024 x 600 screen, we're excited to see it comfortably edge the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-review/">Galaxy S II Skyrocket </a>(54.1) and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> (32.8) -- with our mouths watering at the thought of what this 28nm CPU can do in a smartphone. We've included the benchmark in full after the break, if you're ready for such exciting revelations.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/First-Qualcomm-MSM8960-Snapdragon-S4-graphical-benchmark-score-appears_id26387?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+phonearena%2FySoL+%28Phone+Arena+-+Latest+News%29">Phonearena</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://score.nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2&#38;device_id=1369">Nena</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20159568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/"><img alt="Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> We put <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-msm8960-development-tablet-hands-on-vide/">Qualcomm's S4 development platform</a> through its paces (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/live-from-the-engadget-ces-stage-an-interview-with-qualcomm/">twice</a>, no less) at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/ces/">CES</a>, but shorn of the glitz of Las Vegas, does it have the oomph to wow us? Someone at the company <em>loosed </em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Nenamark 2</a> on the slate, producing a score of 54.90. Given the fact that its producing graphics for a 1024 x 600 screen, we're excited to see it comfortably edge the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-review/">Galaxy S II Skyrocket </a>(54.1) and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> (32.8) -- with our mouths watering at the thought of what this 28nm CPU can do in a smartphone. We've included the benchmark in full after the break, if you're ready for such exciting revelations.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/First-Qualcomm-MSM8960-Snapdragon-S4-graphical-benchmark-score-appears_id26387?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+phonearena%2FySoL+%28Phone+Arena+-+Latest+News%29">Phonearena</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://score.nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2&amp;device_id=1369">Nena</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20159568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> may still be a ways from breaking into the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">smartphone</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">tablet</a> market, but we're finally starting to get some concrete details on its specs and capabilities. <em>VR-Zone</em> got the nitty gritty on Chipzilla's first <em>true</em> SoC and it looks almost ready to run with the big dogs. A reference tablet, running at 1.6GHz with 1GB of RAM (which also packs Bluetooth, WiFi and FM radio) was put through some Android benchmarks and held it's own against a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/snapdragon">Snapdragon</a> MSM8260 -- which pulled a 7,500 and 8,000 in Caffeinemark 3, respectively. The admittedly higher clocked Atom scored an impressive 10,500, though power consumption on the pre-production chips was a bit higher than anticipated. At idle, the fledgling Medfield was sucking down 2.6W and spiking to 3.6W under load. Ultimately Intel hopes to cut those numbers to 2W at idle and 2.6W while pushing out HD video -- not far off from current-gen ARM SoC. Lets not forget though, benchmarks only tell part of the story -- we'll be waiting to see working hardware before declaring a victor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/41967/intel-medfield-cpu-performance-power-consumption-leaked-looks-good/">Netbook News</a></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/intel-s-32nm-medfield-mobile-chip-surprising-performance-power-consumption-leaked/14355.html#ixzz1hhjsk1c4">VR-Zone</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> may still be a ways from breaking into the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">smartphone</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">tablet</a> market, but we're finally starting to get some concrete details on its specs and capabilities. <em>VR-Zone</em> got the nitty gritty on Chipzilla's first <em>true</em> SoC and it looks almost ready to run with the big dogs. A reference tablet, running at 1.6GHz with 1GB of RAM (which also packs Bluetooth, WiFi and FM radio) was put through some Android benchmarks and held it's own against a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/snapdragon">Snapdragon</a> MSM8260 -- which pulled a 7,500 and 8,000 in Caffeinemark 3, respectively. The admittedly higher clocked Atom scored an impressive 10,500, though power consumption on the pre-production chips was a bit higher than anticipated. At idle, the fledgling Medfield was sucking down 2.6W and spiking to 3.6W under load. Ultimately Intel hopes to cut those numbers to 2W at idle and 2.6W while pushing out HD video -- not far off from current-gen ARM SoC. Lets not forget though, benchmarks only tell part of the story -- we'll be waiting to see working hardware before declaring a victor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/41967/intel-medfield-cpu-performance-power-consumption-leaked-looks-good/">Netbook News</a></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/intel-s-32nm-medfield-mobile-chip-surprising-performance-power-consumption-leaked/14355.html#ixzz1hhjsk1c4">VR-Zone</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Atom N2600 benchmark, can&#8217;t cedar wood for the trails?</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/n2600benchmarking131211.png class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/n2600benchmarking131211.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It goes without saying that benchmarking something pre-release requires a cavalcade of sodium-chloride, but our curiousity was piqued at the prospect of some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedar+trail">Cedar Trail</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">sneak-peeks</a>. <em>Netbook Live</em> has been at it again, pitting a 1.6GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/atom/">Atom</a> N2600-touting ASUS Eee PC X101CH, against machines sporting 1.66GHz Atom <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/N570">N570</a> (ASUS 1015PX) and 1.0 GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/amd+c-50">AMD C-50</a> (ASUS 1015B and Tosh NB550D) chips. The initial reports suggest that the 32nm-based N2600 is a touch behind the N570 in general CPU terms, but forges confidently ahead when it comes to graphics. The C-50 showed mixed results in CPU tests, with the N2600 falling behind on graphics this time round. The take-away being if you need more CPU <em>oomph</em> go for the meatier 1.83 GHz N2800. Hit the source link for the blow by blow breakdown.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/">Early Atom N2600 benchmark, can't cedar wood for the trails?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:56:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/41298/intel-atom-n2600-benchmarks-with-amd-c50-n570-comparison/">Netbook News</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooklive.com/intel-atom-n2600-benchmarks-12995/">Netbook Live</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20126767/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/n2600benchmarking131211.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It goes without saying that benchmarking something pre-release requires a cavalcade of sodium-chloride, but our curiousity was piqued at the prospect of some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedar+trail">Cedar Trail</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">sneak-peeks</a>. <em>Netbook Live</em> has been at it again, pitting a 1.6GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/atom/">Atom</a> N2600-touting ASUS Eee PC X101CH, against machines sporting 1.66GHz Atom <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/N570">N570</a> (ASUS 1015PX) and 1.0 GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/amd+c-50">AMD C-50</a> (ASUS 1015B and Tosh NB550D) chips. The initial reports suggest that the 32nm-based N2600 is a touch behind the N570 in general CPU terms, but forges confidently ahead when it comes to graphics. The C-50 showed mixed results in CPU tests, with the N2600 falling behind on graphics this time round. The take-away being if you need more CPU <em>oomph</em> go for the meatier 1.83 GHz N2800. Hit the source link for the blow by blow breakdown.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/">Early Atom N2600 benchmark, can't cedar wood for the trails?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:56:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/41298/intel-atom-n2600-benchmarks-with-amd-c50-n570-comparison/">Netbook News</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooklive.com/intel-atom-n2600-benchmarks-12995/">Netbook Live</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20126767/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><p style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p>
<p>
	LG and Prada may have already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/lg-prada-officially-renew-phone-partnership-confirm-v3-0-for-e/">renewed</a> their wedding vows, but it's been pretty quiet on the designer phone front. However, a stream of benchmark results have surfaced over at <em>Antutu</em>, revealing an LG phone with a 1GHz CPU running Android Gingerbread -- version 2.3.7 to be precise. The handset is labelled up as the P940, suggesting that this could well be the fruits of labor from the fashion-phonemaker collaboration -- aka the Prada K2. A device with the same codename has already paid a visit to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/fcc-fridays-november-4-2011/">FCC</a>, although it kept quiet on the hardware specifics, not revealing much more than a clutch of GPRS and HSPA radios. Rumors suggest the hardware will all be contained in an appropriately stylish 9mm frame, but we'll just have to wait and see. It may be just a sliver of a smartphone, but we hope LG <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/more-optimus-handsets-will-receive-ice-cream-sandwich-upgrade-l/">considers</a> feeding it some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-review/">Ice Cream Sandwich</a> before it makes its debut. Not too much though, it still needs to fit into that Prada outfit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/">LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:54:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://pocketnow.com/android/lg-p940-aka-prada-k2-shows-up-in-antutu-benchmark">PocketNow</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.antutu.net/">Antutu</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p>
<p>
	LG and Prada may have already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/lg-prada-officially-renew-phone-partnership-confirm-v3-0-for-e/">renewed</a> their wedding vows, but it's been pretty quiet on the designer phone front. However, a stream of benchmark results have surfaced over at <em>Antutu</em>, revealing an LG phone with a 1GHz CPU running Android Gingerbread -- version 2.3.7 to be precise. The handset is labelled up as the P940, suggesting that this could well be the fruits of labor from the fashion-phonemaker collaboration -- aka the Prada K2. A device with the same codename has already paid a visit to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/fcc-fridays-november-4-2011/">FCC</a>, although it kept quiet on the hardware specifics, not revealing much more than a clutch of GPRS and HSPA radios. Rumors suggest the hardware will all be contained in an appropriately stylish 9mm frame, but we'll just have to wait and see. It may be just a sliver of a smartphone, but we hope LG <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/more-optimus-handsets-will-receive-ice-cream-sandwich-upgrade-l/">considers</a> feeding it some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-review/">Ice Cream Sandwich</a> before it makes its debut. Not too much though, it still needs to fit into that Prada outfit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/">LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:54:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://pocketnow.com/android/lg-p940-aka-prada-k2-shows-up-in-antutu-benchmark">PocketNow</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.antutu.net/">Antutu</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-heads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/android-futuremark.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/android-futuremark.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Futuremark, father of <em>3DMark</em> and <em>PCMark</em>, has begun work on an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/galaxy-nexus-hspa-review/">Android</a> edition of its benchmarking software. Wittily titled <em>3DMark for Android</em>, it'll bring the industry-standard testing tools to all the phones in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/ice-cream-sandwich-gets-a-two-minute-tour-courtesy-of-a-lucky-e/">Google's yard</a>. When finished, users will be able to measure performance by pushing the phone's CPU, rendering, openGL and physics engines to the limits. Results will be comparable against the company's newest software, including the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/windows-8-for-tablets-hands-on-preview/">Windows 8</a> build. It's inviting handset makers to join a benchmark development program, an exclusive club that already has AMD, NVIDIA, Intel, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ImaginationTechnologies">Imagination Technologies</a>, Dell and HP on the guest list, you can see the full PR after the break -- just be advised, it's black tie only.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/">3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:42:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20117412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/android-futuremark.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Futuremark, father of <em>3DMark</em> and <em>PCMark</em>, has begun work on an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/galaxy-nexus-hspa-review/">Android</a> edition of its benchmarking software. Wittily titled <em>3DMark for Android</em>, it'll bring the industry-standard testing tools to all the phones in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/ice-cream-sandwich-gets-a-two-minute-tour-courtesy-of-a-lucky-e/">Google's yard</a>. When finished, users will be able to measure performance by pushing the phone's CPU, rendering, openGL and physics engines to the limits. Results will be comparable against the company's newest software, including the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/windows-8-for-tablets-hands-on-preview/">Windows 8</a> build. It's inviting handset makers to join a benchmark development program, an exclusive club that already has AMD, NVIDIA, Intel, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ImaginationTechnologies">Imagination Technologies</a>, Dell and HP on the guest list, you can see the full PR after the break -- just be advised, it's black tie only.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/">3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:42:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20117412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indilinx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OczTechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolidStateDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Maybe it's just interference from our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/holidaygiftguide2011/">seasonal goggles</a>, but isn't there something quite cheery about SSD reviews? In the case of OCZ's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/ocz-pushes-access-time-boundaries-with-octane-and-octane-s2-ssds/">Octane</a> drive, our good spirits derive from the sturdy performance of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/14/ocz-buys-indilinx-probably-has-designs-on-building-its-own-ssd/">freshly-conceived</a> Indilinx Everest controller, which ought to keep big players like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandforce">SandForce</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung+ssd/">Samsung</a> on their toes. <em>HotHardware</em> just reviewed the <strike>$369</strike> $879 512GB variant and found that it delivered fast boot-up times, strong read speeds and writes that were just shy of enthusiast-class drives. Follow the source link for the full and possibly festive benchmarks.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Sorry about the optimistic price error. Guess we got carried away with all the holiday discounts. As many of y'all spotted, it's the 256GB version that goes for $369.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> We just added links to reviews from <em>AnandTech</em> and <em>Storage Review</em>, which both arrived at similarly positive conclusions. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/">OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:40:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/OCZ-Octane-Series-SATA-III-Solid-State-Drive-Review/?page=1">HotHardware</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_octane_ssd_review">Storage Review</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5147/the-ocz-octane-review-512gb/1">AnandTech</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Maybe it's just interference from our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/holidaygiftguide2011/">seasonal goggles</a>, but isn't there something quite cheery about SSD reviews? In the case of OCZ's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/ocz-pushes-access-time-boundaries-with-octane-and-octane-s2-ssds/">Octane</a> drive, our good spirits derive from the sturdy performance of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/14/ocz-buys-indilinx-probably-has-designs-on-building-its-own-ssd/">freshly-conceived</a> Indilinx Everest controller, which ought to keep big players like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandforce">SandForce</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung+ssd/">Samsung</a> on their toes. <em>HotHardware</em> just reviewed the <strike>$369</strike> $879 512GB variant and found that it delivered fast boot-up times, strong read speeds and writes that were just shy of enthusiast-class drives. Follow the source link for the full and possibly festive benchmarks.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Sorry about the optimistic price error. Guess we got carried away with all the holiday discounts. As many of y'all spotted, it's the 256GB version that goes for $369.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> We just added links to reviews from <em>AnandTech</em> and <em>Storage Review</em>, which both arrived at similarly positive conclusions. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/">OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:40:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/OCZ-Octane-Series-SATA-III-Solid-State-Drive-Review/?page=1">HotHardware</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_octane_ssd_review">Storage Review</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5147/the-ocz-octane-review-512gb/1">AnandTech</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Jetstream review</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
When HTC entered the tablet game, it did so in reverse course. Where other manufacturers were jostling for elbow room in a 10-inch form factored world, the company opted for smaller, more familiar battleground, eschewing the rough-hewn <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb/">Honeycomb OS</a> for a Gingerbread-baked Sense overlay on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/16/htc-flyer-review/">the Flyer</a>. Naturally, the time for that mini-slate to shine has come and gone. In its stead, we're treated to a flagship of sorts -- HTC's first 10-incher and AT&#38;T's inaugural <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/atandt-commits-to-lte-advanced-deployment-in-2013-hesse-and-mead/">4G LTE</a> slate. Android 3.1 makes an appearance here, as does Sense 1.1 for tablets, but is the skinned experience really any different from the custom UX we've all come to love or hate on phones? Can the added <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/htc+scribe/">Scribe pen</a> functionality, repurposed here from its 7-inch brother, transform the Jetstream from third pillar offering to an always-on, on-the-go assistant? And will those newly hatched 700MHz speeds convince you to cough up for that weighty $700 price tag? Follow along past the break to see how it fared.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568083"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv53dsc00552_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568081"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv51dsc00546_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568082"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv52dsc00550_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568084"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv54dsc00553_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568085"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv55dsc00556_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream review</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20094212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
When HTC entered the tablet game, it did so in reverse course. Where other manufacturers were jostling for elbow room in a 10-inch form factored world, the company opted for smaller, more familiar battleground, eschewing the rough-hewn <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb/">Honeycomb OS</a> for a Gingerbread-baked Sense overlay on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/16/htc-flyer-review/">the Flyer</a>. Naturally, the time for that mini-slate to shine has come and gone. In its stead, we're treated to a flagship of sorts -- HTC's first 10-incher and AT&amp;T's inaugural <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/atandt-commits-to-lte-advanced-deployment-in-2013-hesse-and-mead/">4G LTE</a> slate. Android 3.1 makes an appearance here, as does Sense 1.1 for tablets, but is the skinned experience really any different from the custom UX we've all come to love or hate on phones? Can the added <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/htc+scribe/">Scribe pen</a> functionality, repurposed here from its 7-inch brother, transform the Jetstream from third pillar offering to an always-on, on-the-go assistant? And will those newly hatched 700MHz speeds convince you to cough up for that weighty $700 price tag? Follow along past the break to see how it fared.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568083"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv53dsc00552_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568081"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv51dsc00546_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568082"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv52dsc00550_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568084"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv54dsc00553_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568085"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv55dsc00556_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream review</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:00:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20094212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>webOS 3.0.5 clues point to integrated Twitter, better performance for your TouchPad</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performance-for-your-touchpad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performance-for-your-touchpad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performance-for-your-touchpad/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/webos-synergy2.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/webos-synergy2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If you're the lucky owner of a rare 2011 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/hp-touchpad-review/">TouchPad</a>, the onus is on you to keep it clean, polished and updated. Sure, you've already got a decent Twitter client in the form Spaz HD, and you're getting extra snappy performance from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/hp-touchpad-gets-webos-3-0-4-update-now-able-to-answer-calls-fr/">webOS 3.0.4</a>, but web chatter indicates that something even better could be on the horizon. Developers have started tweeting via 'webOS Synergy', possibly hinting that integrated Twitter could be on the way in 3.0.5. What's more, another TouchPad owner running that newfangled version has submitted an impressive score to Lithium BenchMark, suggesting it might deliver a performance bump too. The duck may be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/hp-officially-out-of-touchpads-best-buy-can-still-help-you-ou/">dead</a>, but the dream <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/29/hps-todd-bradley-refutes-webos-shutdown-rumors-final-destinati/">lives on</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/">webOS 3.0.5 clues point to integrated Twitter, better performance for your TouchPad</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:01:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.webosfrance.com/webOS-3-0-5-en-preparation-pour-le-HP-TouchPad-le-developpement-de-webOS-continue-_a1095.html">webOS France</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.webosroundup.com/2011/11/what-is-webos-synergy/">webOSroundup</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20097401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/webos-synergy2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If you're the lucky owner of a rare 2011 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/hp-touchpad-review/">TouchPad</a>, the onus is on you to keep it clean, polished and updated. Sure, you've already got a decent Twitter client in the form Spaz HD, and you're getting extra snappy performance from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/hp-touchpad-gets-webos-3-0-4-update-now-able-to-answer-calls-fr/">webOS 3.0.4</a>, but web chatter indicates that something even better could be on the horizon. Developers have started tweeting via 'webOS Synergy', possibly hinting that integrated Twitter could be on the way in 3.0.5. What's more, another TouchPad owner running that newfangled version has submitted an impressive score to Lithium BenchMark, suggesting it might deliver a performance bump too. The duck may be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/hp-officially-out-of-touchpads-best-buy-can-still-help-you-ou/">dead</a>, but the dream <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/29/hps-todd-bradley-refutes-webos-shutdown-rumors-final-destinati/">lives on</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/">webOS 3.0.5 clues point to integrated Twitter, better performance for your TouchPad</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:01:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.webosfrance.com/webOS-3-0-5-en-preparation-pour-le-HP-TouchPad-le-developpement-de-webOS-continue-_a1095.html">webOS France</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.webosroundup.com/2011/11/what-is-webos-synergy/">webOSroundup</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20097401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performance-for-your-touchpad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cedar Trail-powered Asus VX6S netbook gets some early benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/><img src=http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/asus-lamborghini-vx6snew-netbookwithintel-cedar-trail.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=25  border=0></a><div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/asus-lamborghini-vx6snew-netbookwithintel-cedar-trail.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Benchmarking unreleased hardware is a dodgy business, largely because you're not working with final drivers. Nevertheless, <em>Netbook Live</em>'s latest efforts could possibly be seen as establishing a bare minimum of what Cedar Trail is capable of. They put a 12-inch Asus Lamborghini VX6S netbook containing the next-gen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">Intel D2700 Atom CPU</a> and the AMD Radeon 6470M GPU up against its Pine Trail/ION2-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/asus-lamborghini-vx6-and-vx7-peel-out-with-nvidia-ion-2-and-core/">VX6 predecessor</a>. For good measure, they also threw in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/asus-eee-pc-1015b-and-1215b-hands-on/">Eee PC 1215B</a> running on AMD's Zacate E-350 APU (not the superior <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/msi-x370-with-amd-e-450-upgrade-arrives-stateside/">E-450</a>). The PC Mark benchmarks gave the VX6S a gain of around ten percent against the Eee PC, with the VX6 coming a distant third-- not quite revolutionary, but that's what you get for being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/cedar-trail-may-be-delayed-new-atoms-gone-til-november/">impatient</a>. Click the source link for more.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Jimmy]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/">Cedar Trail-powered Asus VX6S netbook gets some early benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:03:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooklive.com/intel-atom-d2700-atom-d525-amd-e350-apu-benchmark-comparisons-12025/">Netbook Live</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20083745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/asus-lamborghini-vx6snew-netbookwithintel-cedar-trail.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Benchmarking unreleased hardware is a dodgy business, largely because you're not working with final drivers. Nevertheless, <em>Netbook Live</em>'s latest efforts could possibly be seen as establishing a bare minimum of what Cedar Trail is capable of. They put a 12-inch Asus Lamborghini VX6S netbook containing the next-gen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">Intel D2700 Atom CPU</a> and the AMD Radeon 6470M GPU up against its Pine Trail/ION2-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/asus-lamborghini-vx6-and-vx7-peel-out-with-nvidia-ion-2-and-core/">VX6 predecessor</a>. For good measure, they also threw in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/asus-eee-pc-1015b-and-1215b-hands-on/">Eee PC 1215B</a> running on AMD's Zacate E-350 APU (not the superior <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/msi-x370-with-amd-e-450-upgrade-arrives-stateside/">E-450</a>). The PC Mark benchmarks gave the VX6S a gain of around ten percent against the Eee PC, with the VX6 coming a distant third-- not quite revolutionary, but that's what you get for being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/cedar-trail-may-be-delayed-new-atoms-gone-til-november/">impatient</a>. Click the source link for more.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Jimmy]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/">Cedar Trail-powered Asus VX6S netbook gets some early benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:03:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.netbooklive.com/intel-atom-d2700-atom-d525-amd-e350-apu-benchmark-comparisons-12025/">Netbook Live</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20083745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-buzz.info/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

